Reviews for Conflict: Desert Storm


Decent, but not that great

Cooberstooge | Sept. 6, 2012 | See all Cooberstooge's reviews »

Conflict: Desert Storm is much like the other games in this series - it's a solid shooter, but it by and large has been done far better elsewhere. There's nothing inherently wrong with the game, but there's no originality to it, the campaign is your standard desert combat with a weak back story fare, and the characters aren't memorable.

The game controls just fine, and combat does get intense during firefights. Weapons and vehicles are modeled well, considering the age of the game. Sounds of the weapons and explosions come off as somewhat flat, but they do the job. Map layouts are pretty decent, especially the urban ones, and close-quarters house to house fighting can get a little nerve-wracking.

Graphically, Conflict: Desert Storm is starting to show its age, but the graphics are bug and lag free, so that's a major plus in my books. Your squad looks good, and they each stand out, so recognizing them to issue orders during combat is fairly easy.


Dated and boring

Darkslayer16 | Aug. 15, 2012 | See all Darkslayer16's reviews »

Even at release the game was fairly boring and tedious, but with the amount of games in the genre that play so much better.. this game just isn't worth it. I wouldn't really recommend it to anyone. It's playable yeah, but you would just regret it.



jeyko | Aug. 12, 2012 | See all jeyko's reviews »

Conflict: Deser Storm is bad. The controls are horrible, and the graphics and aesthetics are horrendously ugly. It does not stand out with anything, compared with other Third-Person Tactical Shooters. Stick with Ghost Recon